Dr. Maya Chen, a licensed clinical psychologist in private practice, began treating James L., a 36-year-old software engineer, for generalized anxiety, social isolation, and residual effects of a contentious divorce. Treatment combined cognitive-behavioral strategies with attention to the relational patterns that left him feeling unseen. After six months, panic symptoms had decreased and James had begun painting as a way to tolerate loneliness. The alliance felt solid.
Boundary questions then accumulated in small increments. After a session in which he described feeling invisible to others, James arrived the next week with a tin of homemade cookies. Dr. Chen accepted the modest gift after discussing its meaning and documenting that it appeared to be a culturally ordinary expression of gratitude rather than an attempt to purchase special status. Two weeks later they encountered each other at a Saturday farmers market. The greeting was brief and awkward. James later used an entire session to process whether the chance meeting meant she “liked him outside the office.”
Dr. Chen had once used “we” when referring to weekend plans. James asked whether she was married. She deflected with a general statement about keeping personal life private so the work could stay focused on him, yet she recognized she had already disclosed more than she intended. Shortly afterward he sent a LinkedIn connection request and, in session, offered to rebuild her practice website at no charge because “you’ve helped me so much.” He also invited her to a small community art show where his paintings would be displayed.
Taken one at a time, each request could be described as a boundary crossing rather than a violation. Together they formed a pattern: a gift, extra-session contact, personal curiosity, a potential dual relationship (client as unpaid vendor), and a social invitation. The American Psychological Association Ethics Code (Standard 3.05) cautions psychologists against multiple relationships that could reasonably impair objectivity, competence, or effectiveness, or that risk exploitation or harm. The inherent power differential in psychotherapy meant James’s “voluntary” offers were not fully free of the wish to please, merge with, or secure a special place with his therapist.
Dr. Chen consulted a senior colleague and reviewed her informed-consent materials, which already stated that social-media connections and business arrangements would be declined. In the next session she thanked James for the cookies and the generous offer, declined the website work and the connection request, and explained that attending the art show would mix roles in a way that could confuse both of them. She invited him to explore what it meant to want her there as an audience rather than as a clinician. The discussion revealed a longstanding pattern of trying to earn closeness through usefulness—the same pattern that had complicated his marriage.
Documentation, consultation, and transparent conversation restored a clearer frame. James felt disappointed but not abandoned; work on intimacy and self-worth deepened. The case illustrates that ethics in psychotherapy is less a set of rigid prohibitions than continual attention to power, meaning, and the difference between a single crossing that can be processed and a slope that quietly converts the therapy into something else. Clear policies, early discussion of incidental contact and digital boundaries, and a habit of consultation protect both the client and the integrity of the work.
Want to learn more?
Ethics and Boundaries in Psychotherapy is a 3-hour online continuing education (CE) course intended to give psychotherapists the tools they need to resolve ethical and boundary issues and dilemmas that may be encountered in their everyday professional practice.
Course #31-61 | 2026 | 20 posttest questions
CE Information
Professional Development Resources is approved by the American Psychological Association (APA) to sponsor continuing education for psychologists. Professional Development Resources maintains responsibility for all programs and content. Professional Development Resources is also approved by the National Board of Certified Counselors (NBCC ACEP #5590); the Association of Social Work Boards (ASWB #1046, ACE Program); the Continuing Education Board of the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA #AAUM); the American Occupational Therapy Association (AOTA #3159); the Commission on Dietetic Registration (CDR Prior Approval Program); the Alabama State Board of Occupational Therapy; the Arizona Board of Behavioral Health Examiners, Board of Occupational Therapy Examiners, and Board of Psychologist Examiners; the Arkansas Board of Examiners in Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology and State Medical Board for Occupational Therapy; the Florida Board of Clinical Social Work, Marriage & Family Therapy, and Mental Health Counseling, Board of Psychology, Office of School Psychology, Board of Speech-Language Pathology & Audiology, Board of Occupational Therapy, and Dietetics and Nutrition Practice Council; the Georgia Board of Examiners of Licensed Dietitians and Licensed Nutritionists, Board of Professional Counselors, Social Workers, and MFTs, State Board of Examiners of Psychologists, and State Board of Occupational Therapy; the Kansas Behavioral Sciences Regulatory Board for Marriage & Family Therapy, Professional Counseling, Psychology, and Social Work, and Board of Healing Arts for Occupational Therapy; the Louisiana State Board of Medical Examiners for Occupational Therapy; the Michigan Board of Occupational Therapy, Board of Psychology, Board of Speech-Language Pathology, and Board of Social Work; the Mississippi State Board of Examiners for Licensed Professional Counselors, the Bureau of Professional Licensure for Occupational Therapists, and Dietitians; the New Hampshire Board of Licensed Dietitians, Board of Mental Health Practice, Board of Psychologists, and Occupational Therapy Governing Board; the New York State Education Department’s State Board for Psychology (#PSY-0145), State Board for Mental Health Practitioners for licensed mental health counselors (#MHC-0135) and marriage and family therapists (#MFT-0100), and the State Board for Social Workers (#SW-0664); the North Carolina Psychology Board; the North Dakota Board of Social Work Examiners, State Board of Occupational Practice, and State Board of Psychologist Examiners; the Ohio Counselor, Social Worker, and Family Therapist Board and Speech and Hearing Professionals Board; the Oklahoma Board of Medical Licensure and Supervision for Occupational Therapy; the South Carolina Board of Professional Counselors and Marriage & Family Therapists (#193), Board of Examiners in Psychology, Board of Examiners in Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology, Board of Occupational Therapy, and Board of Social Work Examiners; the Tennessee Board of Examiners of Psychology, Board for Licensed Professional Counselors, Licensed Marital and Family Therapists, and Licensed Clinical Pastoral Therapists, Board of Occupational Therapy, and Board of Social Workers; the Texas State Board of Examiners of Marriage and Family Therapists (#114), State Board of Social Worker Examiners (#5678), State Board of Examiners of Professional Counselors, and State Board of Examiners of Psychologists; the West Virginia Board of Examiners in Counseling and Board of Social Work; the Wyoming Board of Psychology; and is CE Broker compliant (#50-1635 – completions are reported within 24 hours).
PDR offers over 100 accredited online CE courses for healthcare professionals.
Target Audience: Psychologists, School Psychologists, Counselors, Social Workers, Marriage & Family Therapists (MFTs), Speech-Language Pathologists (SLPs), Occupational Therapists (OTs), Registered Dietitian Nutritionists (RDNs), and Teachers
Enjoy 20% off all online continuing education (CE/CEU) courses @pdresources.org! Click here for details.